I never had the playlist problem with iTunes on a PC. Now I thought this did not make any sense. Note that new installs of Office 2019 for Mac will also require macOS 10.14 or later.Ok so on my MacBook Pro I had an issue with syncing music playlist so I called Apple, after about an hour on the phone of try this, try that, they finally said the only way to fix the problem was to upgrade to Catalina. Upgrading your operating system to macOS 10.14 or later will allow Office updates to be delivered for your apps. If you continue with an older version of macOS, your Office apps will still work, but youll no longer receive any updates including security updates.
![]() I use a normal, middle-of-the-road "DPReview Reader" software / accessory stack-Adobe CC apps, Capture One, Photomechanic, Wacom tablet, etc.That said: I would nonetheless summarize Catalina as a "janky disappointment." The "upgrade" improved nothing about my overall Mac user experience. And it has continued to work since. I clicked the update button in October everything worked afterward. If that happens and I have no alternative to upgrading, I just may go over to the dark side and build a Windows super-machine.I sense I'm among the lucky few (?) who had an uneventful Catalina transition (on a low-rent 2015 13" Macbook Pro). Everything is working well at the moment, but knowing Apple, like Adobe and other big players in the software business, they will probably do everything they can to force us to upgrade. I run Mojave on 4 Macs, including two Mac Pros and a MacBook Pro. Photo mosaic software free download for macIdle RAM usage is up a little, too. And the activity monitor confirms what I'm seeing: at idle, my Mac's processor is running ~ 92-93% free instead of ~ 98, 99% free. Sometimes my Wacom table lags on a Photoshop brushstroke-again, not uniformly or unusably, but here and there, just enough to annoy. Little delays and hitches pop up here and there, or there's the occasional spinner in workflow steps that ran lag-free on Mojave and earlier Mac OSes. I emphasize "a little"-the margin isn't tragic-but it's noticeable and annoying. And there's no apparent rhyme or reason to what provokes the dialogues-sometimes they just appear for an app or driver you aren't even using why are you asking me about this now, Mac? I swear it's worse than Windows Vista. The relentless confirm-deny security pop-ups are killing me. The new "Catalyst" media apps are even dumber than they look. That's just how it's going to be, apparently. You need to install your $200 Mastin Labs LR presets? Too bad: the installer is 32-bit. And they're even worse under the hood: if you download podcast episodes, the app stores them in an obscure user library folder ("~/Library/Group Containers/243LU875E5.groups.com.apple.podcasts"-I sh_t you not!!!) and the app doesn't save episodes with their original file names. They don't even bother following Apple's own MacOS UI guidelines, violating standards and expectations in a million different ways-from inconsistent link-button indication and highlighting / selection behavior to the oddly "modal" content arrangement in the podcast and movie apps. Information density appears scaled exclusively for fat-fingered toddlers. The Wacom driver occasionally tanks on waking up from sleep.So: at a fundamental level, "upgrading" to Catalina gave me a slightly slower, slightly buggier, definitely more needy-annoying computer with kludgy media apps designed-for-toddlers-poking-iPads and various new technical restrictions that prohibit my legacy Photoshop plugins or preset installations.Bottom line, Catalina offers no performance or usability improvement that I can see.Maybe others can offer a more technical perspective on what Apple is trying accomplish? Otherwise, Catalina seems bereft of direction and reason-for-being, to me.Rolling back to Mojave's been on my to-do list and, honestly, once that's done, I don't think I'm going to roll my Macbook forward from that, ever. Monitor brightness sometimes resets on restart. The iCloud control panel sometimes spinner-freezes. There have been so many little bugs here and there, many corrected by the point releases, but not all sometimes it feels like death-by-a-thousand-cuts. Forum Plus And IntegerThe APFS makes this seemingly very efficient on a SSD.Interesting solution-but I wonder if I'm missing something around the word "efficient."Is there a way to access your Mojave partition and run your 32-bit apps-utilities without wholly rebooting your system? I ask because at a glance it seems like it'd be a pretty inefficient photography workflow "hitch," despite SSD speeds. If Apple can't maintain a regular interest in keeping their offerings tip-top, then I won't maintain a regular interest in them, either.I keep a second bootable partItion for Mojave to run Dreamweaver cs5 and a couple of other 32 bit apps. But those same bugs on a brand new $3K, $4K 16" Macbook Pro or a $$$$$ Mac Pro, doing whatever big-important work Mac Pros are supposed to do? It'd be c ompletely unacceptable.So, yeah: working with a Mac is not the "given" it once was for me (which I say as someone who started with an Apple ][ plus and Integer Basic as a kindergartener in 1981). And no, I wouldn't consider the new $50,000 Mac Pro or even the new 16" Macbook Pro much of a renaissance: both have to run Catalina! They're hardware concepts Apple didn't have enough corporate interest to actually finish with refined software.The Catalina bugs I, joe-schmo-nobody, experiences running a $1300 Macbook Pro from 2015? Meh, OK. Yeah, they recognize it's a multi-billion-dollar cashstream, still and they understand it's the only way to develop iOS apps, still so they give it lip service and begrudgingly ping it with hand-me-down iOS ideas or iOS-device tie-ins but no real innovation has begun with the Mac in a long, long time. Some of it is too convenient, and some simply not "replaceable". Haven’t tried this.I see no benefits to using Catalina vis-a-vis Mojave.I have a library of 32-bit software I'm not ready to give up. With APFS it is ok to partition your SSD.There are other options as others have said including running Mojave in a window of Catalina. Although everything will run in Mojave so I could just stay there when the prominent task is Dreamweaver related.Using APFS keeps all free space from both partitions as available to either getting rid of the “don’t partition your SSD”. "Are you running Mojave in a virtualized window on Catalina, for example, and you can just pass a file from your Catalina boot instance into the Mojave window? Doing that with VMWare? Performance is OK, virtualized?That wouldn’t work well.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMisty ArchivesCategories |